opentweet_update_evergreen_post

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description claims non-destructive updates (cooldown, pause/unpause) but annotations set destructiveHint=true, creating a contradiction. No mention of side effects, authorization, or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no wasted words. Clearly front-loads the purpose before listing actions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple update tool with 3 parameters and no output schema, description is adequate but lacks context on what pause/cooldown changes mean operationally.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description echoes schema parameters but adds no new meaning; e.g., does not explain that cooldown_days=null uses global default.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb (update), resource (evergreen post), and specific actions (cooldown period, pause/unpause). Distinguishes from siblings like opentweet_remove_from_evergreen.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies use for updating settings of an existing evergreen post but lacks explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives, e.g., no mention of when to use opentweet_add_to_evergreen instead.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.