获取加密货币杠杆多空比

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only mentions the operation and automatic retry, but omits behavioral traits such as data freshness, rate limits, error handling, or whether the operation is read-only. Minimal disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first clearly states purpose, second mentions automatic retry. No extraneous words, front-loaded, efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, and description does not explain the return value format (e.g., single number, object). For a simple tool, an agent might need to know what the ratio looks like or if it's cumulative over a period. Incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions for period and symbol, so the description adds no new information about parameters. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it gets the cumulative ratio of borrowed quote to borrowed base currency on OKX, distinguishing it from siblings like okx_prices and okx_taker_volume. However, the title mentions 'leverage long/short ratio' which slightly differs from the description's emphasis on borrowed currencies, causing minor ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. While the tool's niche (OKX loan ratios) is implied, the description lacks explicit context for when an agent should choose this over other OKX tools or stock tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.