Get DEX Pair Analytics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, etc. Description adds value by noting the tool is '[PRO]' and requires an API key, plus mentions specific analytics like wash trading detection. No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first lists capabilities, second states prerequisite. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given single parameter, full schema coverage, annotations, and output schema existence, description adequately covers purpose and key behavioral context. Could mention that output schema provides detailed return structure, but not necessary.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only parameter 'address' is fully described in schema (100% coverage). Description does not add additional meaning beyond what schema provides, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it provides 'detailed analytics for a PulseX trading pair' and lists specific metrics (price, volume, liquidity, etc.), distinguishing it from sibling tools like get-top-pairs or get-token-price.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Includes prerequisite ('[PRO]', requires API key) but does not explicitly guide when to use this vs alternatives or when not to use it. Context implies it's for comprehensive pair analysis.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.