Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
openpoem

spec-score-mcp

by openpoem
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to spec-score-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • slop-guard

      Nomura22872
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to score prose from 0-100 for formulaic AI writing tells using purely programmatic rule-based heuristics, with no LLM judge or API calls. Returns a numeric score, band label, specific violations with surrounding context, per-category counts, and concrete advice, and can also analyze a file path directly.
      -

    • mcp-schema-audit-mcp

      tylerscomic-lab
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Scores MCP tool definitions and tool lists from 0-100, flagging vague descriptions, missing parameter docs, non-verb-first naming, oversized enums, and nested schemas with severity, rationale, and concrete fixes. It also validates marketplace listings against platform character caps such as MCPize's 500-character short-description limit before deploy.
      MIT

    • slop-guard

      damian2651
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to score prose from 0–100 for formulaic AI writing patterns using a purely rule-based linter, returning numeric scores, band labels, specific violations with context, and concrete advice. Also supports analyzing text files on disk directly.
      -

    • slop-guard

      Arthurm38886
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to analyze text or files and receive numeric slop scores, band labels, specific violations with context, and concrete writing advice, using rule-based diagnostics with no LLM judge or API calls.
      -

    • slop-guard

      TeresaLang
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Scores text from 0 to 100 for formulaic AI writing patterns using configurable rule-based heuristics with no LLM judge or API calls. Enables agents to lint inline strings or files and receive a score, band, specific violations with context, and concrete advice.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools have overlapping purposes that could cause confusion. spec_score and spec_visualize both score a spec on the same four axes and provide the same analysis, making them nearly redundant. Only spec_compare has a clearly distinct function by comparing two specs, but the other two tools are ambiguous in their differentiation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a consistent pattern with all tools using the prefix 'spec_' followed by a verb (compare, score, visualize). This makes the purpose of each tool predictable and readable, though the similarity in naming between spec_score and spec_visualize contributes to the disambiguation issue.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 3 tools, the count is reasonable for a server focused on spec evaluation. It covers core functions like scoring, comparing, and visualizing specs, which aligns well with the server's purpose, though the overlap between spec_score and spec_visualize suggests the set could be streamlined without losing functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is mostly complete for spec evaluation, covering scoring, comparison, and visualization. However, there is a notable gap in tools for editing or updating specs based on the analysis, which could limit workflow coverage. The redundancy between spec_score and spec_visualize also indicates inefficiency rather than a functional gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources