Skip to main content
Glama
openpharma-org

European Financial Filings MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to European Financial Filings MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Access European company data and financial filings from multiple sources including GLEIF, ESEF, UK Companies House, and curated index lists. Supports search, filing retrieval, and XBRL data extraction.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for EU company and business data. 9 tools: company search (GLEIF, 2M+ entities), LEI lookup, corporate structures (parent/subsidiaries), trade register search, EU VAT validation (VIES), GDP, unemployment, inflation, and business demography (Eurostat). All APIs free, no keys required.
      9
      5
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables deep analysis of SEC EDGAR filings through universal company search, document content extraction, and advanced filing search capabilities. Provides AI-ready access to business descriptions, risk factors, financial statements, and full-text search across any public company's SEC documents.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to SEC filings and detailed XBRL financial data for all publicly traded U.S. companies. It enables users to search for company info, retrieve historical metrics like revenue and assets, and compare financial performance across different industries.
      6
      1
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing tools with overlapping purposes. The tool's description clearly states its unified role for European financial filings, leaving no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'eu-filings' is clear and descriptive, using a geographic prefix and resource type. There are no other tools to introduce inconsistency, so the naming is perfectly coherent.

    Tool Count2/5

    The server covers a very broad domain (EU financial filings across 27+ countries) with only one tool, which feels insufficient. A well-scoped server for this purpose would typically have separate tools for searching, retrieving, and inspecting filings and XBRL data.

    Completeness3/5

    The description claims comprehensive access, but the single-tool design leaves uncertainty about whether all necessary operations (e.g., search, filter, download, detail views) are fully covered. It likely handles core retrieval, but any missing operation would be a significant gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues