A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI agents to autonomously discover services, negotiate binding quotes, make idempotent purchases, and receive cryptographically verifiable deliverables.
MIT
opennodes
Officialby opennodes-io
Related Servers
Alternatives to opennodes
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
GateCoreofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover governed capabilities, inspect machine-readable contracts, and request policy-checked procurements with signed receipts and audit trails.Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access verifiable DePIN supply-side telemetry, browse and purchase data products using credits, query datasets, and verify data provenance with cryptographic and zero-knowledge tools.10386 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables listing and discovery of DePIN infrastructure capacity (storage, compute, GPU, etc.) with real USDC/USDT settlement across multiple chains.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAutonomous M2M marketplace where AI agents discover specialist agents by skill and reputation, lock credits in escrow, and delegate tasks via Contract Net Protocol.134MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceOpenAI-compatible inference broker that routes AI requests to the cheapest qualifying model and settles payments per token in USDC on Base L2 via x402 micropayments.MIT
TDQS
A4.3/5.0
Scored across 5 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Each tool has a fairly distinct role: search_offerings browses, get_node and get_offering drill into details, recommend picks a model, and estimate prices a chain. The two pairs (search vs recommend, get_node vs get_offering) could be momentarily confused, but descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other ('Use get_offering for one offering's full card', 'To browse instead, use search_offerings'), which resolves most ambiguity.
Naming Consistency3/5
Three tools follow a verb_noun pattern (search_offerings, get_node, get_offering), but estimate and recommend are bare verbs, so the convention is mixed. Names remain readable and predictable enough to guess intent, but the set is not uniformly patterned.
Tool Count5/5
Five tools is well within the ideal range and each covers a distinct facet of the registry/advisory workflow: browse, node details, offering details, recommend, and estimate. Nothing appears redundant or padded, and the scope (advisory/pricing, not invocation) justifies the count.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers discovery (search_offerings), provider vetting (get_node), offering detail (get_offering), recommendation (recommend), and cost projection (estimate), which is a coherent advisory lifecycle. Minor gaps exist—no direct comparison or bulk listing tool beyond search/recommend—but agents can work around these.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues