Skip to main content
Glama
openags

Paper Search MCP

by openags
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Paper Search MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • paper-search-mcp

      morosss
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server for searching and downloading academic papers from arXiv, PubMed, bioRxiv, and more. It integrates with LLMs like Claude Desktop for paper discovery.
      MIT

    • MCP Paper Finder

      Walids35
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for searching, downloading, and reading academic papers from multiple sources such as arXiv, Google Scholar, and Elsevier.
      6
      MIT

    • paper-mcp

      Friedemann12
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for searching and reading arXiv papers, enabling paper search, retrieval, and summarization through Claude.
      6
      -

    • paper-search-mcp

      Nehra-Amaterasu
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for searching and downloading academic papers from multiple free and public sources, enabling LLM-driven academic research workflows.
      57
      MIT

    • Academic Paper MCP HTTP/SSE

      pastchais
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 57 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The tools are highly ambiguous due to extensive overlap across sources; for example, download_arxiv and download_semantic both download PDFs, and search_arxiv and search_semantic both search papers, making it difficult for an agent to choose the right tool without deep knowledge of each source. The descriptions clarify the source but not the functional distinction, leading to potential misselection when the agent doesn't care about the specific source.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a perfectly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, with all tools using snake_case and clear prefixes like download_, read_, search_, and get_. This predictability makes it easy for an agent to understand the action and target, such as download_arxiv_paper or search_crossref.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 57 tools, the count is extremely high for a paper search server, far exceeding the typical well-scoped range of 3-15 tools. This creates a bloated and overwhelming interface that is difficult for an agent to navigate efficiently, as many tools are redundant across sources rather than adding unique functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set is highly complete for the domain of paper search and retrieval, covering download, read, search, and metadata retrieval across numerous academic sources. There are no obvious gaps; the tools provide full lifecycle coverage from discovery to content extraction, including a unified search tool for convenience.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources