register_token_account

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'register', implying creation, but does not mention idempotency, authentication needs, or side effects. For a mutation tool, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no redundant words. It is front-loaded, but brevity sacrifices substance. Still, it earns its place as a minimal statement of purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a complex nested input and multiple sibling tools, but the description is too brief to provide sufficient context. Although an output schema exists, users lack understanding of parameters and the domain concept of 'token account'. The description is incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has a nested 'spec' object with fields 'token', 'alias', 'metadata', 'categories', but the description provides zero parameter information. With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate, yet it offers no explanations of what these fields represent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Register a new lzt-eventus token account', which identifies a specific verb and resource. However, it does not explain what a 'token account' is or how it differs from similar creation tools like create_subscription. The sibling tools include list_token_accounts, suggesting this is a creation counterpart, but no distinction is made.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_subscription, create_flow). There are no prerequisites, recommendations, or exclusion criteria. The description merely states the action without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.