MCP Compras.gov.br
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Compras.gov.br
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables read-only access to official Brazilian government procurement data from Compras.gov.br and the PNCP, covering all cataloged public GET endpoints through MCP tools.175-

licinexus-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenancerazilian public procurement (PNCP) and Federal Revenue CNPJ data for any MCP client. 18 tools covering bids, contracts, atas de registro de preço, annual procurement plans, CNPJ enrichment, plus temporal aggregation and period comparison. MIT licensed, maintained by Licinexus under Law 14.133/2021.1860 npm78MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying Brazilian public transparency data for companies by CNPJ, returning indicators like sanctions, agreements, and contracts. Read-only and works with any MCP client over HTTP.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates 6 Korean public procurement APIs to search, analyze, and manage procurement data using natural language.83MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query Paraguay's public procurement data via the official DNCP API v3 (OCDS), including tender processes, awards, contracts, suppliers, contracting entities, product catalog, and visualizations.17MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying El Salvador's public procurement data, including awarded processes, supplier contracts, and institution details, from the live COMPRASAL API through an MCP interface.81MIT
TDQS
Scored across 100 tools
The tools are generally organized around distinct resources and actions, and the descriptions are unusually explicit about sources, regimes, and endpoint quirks. However, 100 tools create several close families—pesquisar_preco_material vs. detalhar_preco_material, the multiple contrato/contratação listers, and the ARP/PGC/PCA variants—that require careful reading to select correctly.
Most names use a compras_<domain>_<action> shape, but the action placement and vocabulary vary widely: listar_* and consultar_* appear before or after the resource, several names are noun-only (compras_pncp_modalidades, compras_versao, compras_contrato_garantias), and words like aggregate and healthcheck break the Portuguese convention. The prefix is consistent, but the overall pattern is not.
100 tools is an extreme count for an MCP surface and far exceeds the well-scoped range. The set is fragmented into many fine-grained contract sub-resources, source/regime variants, and meta-tools for prompts/resources/health, making navigation and selection unnecessarily costly for an agent.
The surface is remarkably comprehensive for read-only Brazilian procurement data: catalogs, PNCP and legacy regimes, ARPs, contracts, suppliers, sanctions, price research, PGC/PCA, and operational diagnostics are all covered with few dead ends. Minor gaps remain—CATSER lacks explicit divisão/grupo steps, there is no true substring catalog search, and contract-by-supplier requires knowing the órgão—but these are documented and workable.