Skip to main content
Glama
onsecurity

OnSecurity MCP Server

by onsecurity
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to OnSecurity MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • dtrack-mcp

      drewrukin
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects Claude to Dependency-Track for natural language vulnerability triage, analysis, and management.
      14
      MIT
    • @konsulto/mcp by konsulto

      @konsulto/mcpofficial

      konsulto
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables Claude Code to drive the Konsulto cybersecurity audit platform from the CLI, including reading and writing findings, managing evidence, and handling scope and assets.
      19
      3 npm
      1
      MIT
    • @repomend/mcp by RepoMend-dev

      @repomend/mcpofficial

      RepoMend-dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Security scanning MCP server that connects Claude to RepoMend findings, enabling vulnerability management and automated fix drafting.
      MIT

    • nvd-mcp

      derrickjudge
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that brings NIST National Vulnerability Database (NVD) intelligence directly into Claude, enabling CVE lookup, product search, and prioritized risk assessment via natural language.
      3
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting different resources: blocks (security templates), findings (client security issues), notifications (client alerts), prerequisites (assessment requirements), and rounds (assessment cycles). The descriptions explicitly differentiate them, with notes like 'NOT THE BLOCKS TOOL' to prevent confusion, ensuring no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with hyphens (e.g., get-blocks, get-findings, get-notifications). This uniform naming convention makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate, with no deviations in style or structure across the five tools.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 5 tools, the count is reasonable for a security assessment server, covering key areas like templates, findings, notifications, prerequisites, and rounds. It is slightly lean but well-scoped; minor gaps like update or delete operations are acceptable given the server's focus on data retrieval for client summaries.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set provides good read-only coverage for retrieving security assessment data, but there are notable gaps in CRUD operations. For example, there are no tools for creating, updating, or deleting findings, blocks, or rounds, which limits agents to viewing data without modifying it, potentially hindering workflow completeness in a security management context.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources