create_menu

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, and the description adds no behavioral context beyond the action itself. It does not disclose whether creating the default menu overwrites an existing menu, what permissions are required, or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler or repetition. It is efficient, though it achieves conciseness by omitting important contextual information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a menu-creation tool with a free-form button array, the description is too thin. It gives no information about button constraints, the relationship to the current menu, or how this differs from conditional menu creation. The output schema may cover return values, but invocation context remains incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% parameter description coverage, and the description does not mention the 'buttons' parameter at all. Since the description was the only chance to clarify the button array structure, this is a significant gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('创建' / create) and a specific resource ('默认自定义菜单' / default custom menu). The word '默认' (default) distinguishes this from the sibling tool create_conditional_menu, making the tool's target clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as create_conditional_menu, delete_menu, or get_current_menu. The word 'default' implies a use case, but the description does not explicitly state when to choose this tool or when not to.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.