Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcpcost

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables agents to look up and search servers from the official MCP registry, probe any server live for availability, protocol, auth, tools and context-token cost, and retrieve registry-wide statistics. Also supplies a CLI and GitHub Action that measure how many tokens your own configured servers' tool definitions consume against a budget.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Live LLM pricing as an MCP server. Ask Claude or any MCP client 'how much does this prompt cost?' and get real numbers from a hand-checked pricing table for every major LLM.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables auditing MCP servers' tools by their estimated context token cost, ranking verbose names, descriptions, and schemas before they consume the agent window. Can run as an MCP tool so agents can budget their own context.
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct axis of the domain: registry lookup by name, discovery/ranking by query, side-by-side comparison, whole-registry aggregates, single-server live measurement, and whole-config measurement. The descriptions explicitly cross-reference the right alternative for each edge case (unknown name -> measure_server, no name -> search_servers), leaving essentially no room for misselection.

Naming Consistency4/5

Five of six names follow a clear verb_noun pattern (lookup_server, search_servers, compare_servers, measure_config, measure_server) with consistent snake_case. registry_summary breaks the pattern as noun_noun, a minor deviation that is still readable and unambiguous.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools is well within the sweet spot, and each earns its place: three read-only board tools, one aggregate, and two measurement tools split sensibly by scope (single server vs. config file). No redundant or filler tools.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers discovery, detail, comparison, aggregate baselines, and live measurement of both individual servers and full configs, including graceful handling of auth failures and timeouts. Minor gap: no per-tool token breakdown within a server, only totals, so an agent cannot see which tool in a server is expensive.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessSyncing