A
licenseB
qualityF
maintenanceTrack LLM token costs across Claude, GPT and Gemini. MCP server + CLI with optimization hints and $ savings estimates.
8
10 npm
1
MIT
mcpcost
by ondraulehla
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcpcost
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLive LLM pricing as an MCP server. Ask Claude or any MCP client 'how much does this prompt cost?' and get real numbers from a hand-checked pricing table for every major LLM.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for deterministic, zero-dependency context-window math, enabling token estimation, text truncation, and budget reporting without a tokenizer.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceDiagnoses MCP server token costs, finds duplicates, grades efficiency, and generates optimization reports.33 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables auditing MCP servers' tools by their estimated context token cost, ranking verbose names, descriptions, and schemas before they consume the agent window. Can run as an MCP tool so agents can budget their own context.1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for counting tokens in text or files using model-specific tokenizers, and reporting file metrics like lines, characters, and size.6-
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation4/5
measure_server, measure_config, lookup_server and search_servers each target a distinct input (single live server, config file, registry entry, registry query). The only soft overlap is measure_server vs lookup_server, since both report a server's token cost, but the descriptions clearly separate live measurement from cached registry probe data.
Naming Consistency5/5
All four names follow the same verb_noun convention (measure_*, lookup_*, search_*), lower snake_case throughout with no deviations. The pattern is predictable and self-explanatory.
Tool Count5/5
Four tightly scoped tools cover the domain of token-cost measurement without redundancy. Each one maps to a distinct workflow (single server, config file, registry lookup, registry discovery), so nothing feels padded or missing.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers live measurement, bulk config measurement, registry lookup and registry search, giving a full path from discovery to cost comparison. Minor gaps remain, such as comparing two servers side by side or exporting results, but core workflows are covered.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues