A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage Context Repo prompts, documents, and collections with semantic search and progressive disclosure navigation.
37 npm
1
MIT
ContextKeeper MCP Server
by ondrahracek
Related Servers
Alternatives to ContextKeeper MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation that enables AI assistants to interact with Anytype's API through natural language, allowing users to manage their knowledge base through conversation.637 npm521MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets AI assistants manage DataMammoth infrastructure through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server providing virtual memory for AI context with durable SQLite storage, retrieval, and bounded prompt assembly to manage context windows.16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server enabling AI assistants to store, retrieve, and manage contextual information across conversations with features like persistent memory, advanced search, tagging, and privacy controls.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for intelligent memory and task management with semantic search, automatic task extraction, and knowledge graphs, enabling AI assistants to maintain context and learn project conventions.MIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 9 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: list vs search vs status, CRUD operations (add, edit, mark_done, remove), and setup/sync (init, sync). No two tools could be easily confused.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_context_items, add_context_item, mark_context_done, get_context_status, search_context_items, remove_context_item, edit_context_item, sync_context_items, init_context.
Tool Count5/5
9 tools is well-scoped for a context management server, covering all essential operations without redundancy or bloat.
Completeness4/5
Core CRUD and lifecycle are covered (create, read, update, delete, status, search, sync). Minor gap: soft-deleted items are described as recoverable but no explicit recovery tool is exposed, which is a small dead end.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues