Skip to main content
Glama
omnirogue

omniseek-mcp

by omnirogue

Related Servers

Alternatives to omniseek-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables triage of SAST findings by exposing a read-only MCP server with tools to access hash-verified source-to-sink code slices, unguarded sinks, and layered enrichment for local LLM analysis.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI IDEs to chat with, search, explain, refactor, and audit a local codebase without uploading source code, returning answers backed by file-and-line source citations, confidence scores, and severity labels, plus audit and board-ready strategic reports. Runs locally and standalone as an MCP server compatible with Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and DeepSeek Harness.
      629 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Analyzes repositories, explains architecture, calculates change impact, and enforces guardrails for AI Agents like Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex via MCP tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM coding harnesses to profile authorized repositories, select applicable defensive security techniques, and report coverage and plain-language results in markdown or SARIF while keeping scans read-only and authorization-gated.
      17 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to query previously analyzed GitHub repositories for architecture analysis, code review findings, and single-turn code Q&A with verifiable file and line references.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct stage of a pipeline: omniseek_scan generates findings, omniseek_verify_citations validates citations in a findings document, and omniseek_render_dossier formats output. There is no overlap in trigger conditions or inputs, so misselection is unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tools use the same omniseek_ snake_case prefix followed by a concise action phrase (scan, verify_citations, render_dossier). The convention is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is on the lean side but each corresponds to a genuine, non-redundant step (scan, verify, render). The surface feels intentionally minimal rather than padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The scan → verify → render lifecycle covers the core workflow end to end, including multiple output formats and git-ref grounding checks. Minor gaps exist, such as baseline/diff comparison between scans or filtering of prior findings, but nothing blocks the primary use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues