Skip to main content
Glama
omnicoreos

planka-mcp

by omnicoreos
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to planka-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • kanban-mcp

      bradrisse
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Planka kanban boards, including creating, updating, and organizing tasks, lists, and cards via MCP.
      15 npm
      59
      MIT

    • Planka MCP Server

      vicsvegeo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to interact with Planka (a Trello-like kanban tool) through natural language, using their own Planka access tokens for authentication and permissions. Supports remote hosting via HTTP, allowing multi-user MCP access to boards, lists, cards, and more.
      15 npm
      MIT

    • backlog

      backloghq
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Persistent, cross-session task management for Claude Code. 24 MCP tools for tasks, projects, dependencies, and docs. 7 skills for planning, standups, and handoffs. Event-sourced storage with per-project isolation.
      5
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct resource-action pairs, but planka_get_structure and planka_get_board overlap in what they return, and manage_lists/manage_labels bundle multiple operations while set_card_labels is narrow. Overall, the descriptions resolve most ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The planka_ prefix and snake_case verb_noun pattern are consistent and readable. The use of 'manage' for lists and labels is a slight deviation from the more specific create/update/delete verbs, but not confusing.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools is at the upper edge of the ideal range but each tool represents a distinct operation needed for board, card, task, label, and comment management. No tool feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolkit covers the core lifecycle for cards, tasks, labels, and lists, plus comments and board structure reading. Missing comment update/delete and board-level CRUD are minor gaps that agents can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources