Skip to main content
Glama
omamishra8051-source

PenTest MCP

by omamishra8051-source
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to PenTest MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • pentestMCP

      RamKansal
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes over 20 standard penetration testing utilities, such as Nmap, SQLMap, and OWASP ZAP, as callable tools for AI agents. It enables natural language control over complex security workflows for automated and interactive penetration testing.
      97
      -

    • Pentest Tools MCP Server

      ch1nhpd
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server that integrates various penetration testing tools, enabling security professionals to perform reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, and API testing through natural language commands in compatible LLM clients like Claude Desktop.
      7
      -

    • redteam-mcp

      samirjani03
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A penetration testing MCP server that runs 20 hacking tools inside a Kali Linux Docker container, enabling AI assistants to execute security scans and attacks via natural language.
      2
      -

    • asi-mcp

      deruke
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-powered Attack Surface Intelligence server that exposes industry-standard penetration testing tools via MCP, enabling AI agents to perform comprehensive security assessments.
      3
      -

    • Pentest-mcp

      d01ki
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Unified penetration testing MCP server for Claude Desktop providing 34 security tools for reconnaissance, web scanning, code analysis, and authenticated testing.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes (e.g., multiple port scanners, fuzzers, and vulnerability scanners). While descriptions provide some distinction, the high degree of redundancy makes it difficult for an agent to select the correct tool for a task.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools are named after actual tool names (e.g., nmap, sqlmap) which are not descriptive of actions. There are a few descriptive names like ping and init_session, but overall the naming is a mix of proper nouns and verbs, lacking a consistent pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    31 tools is excessive for the scope, with many overlapping functionalities (e.g., 3 fuzzers, 2 TLS scanners). The count feels inflated by bundling every available tool rather than curating a minimal, non-redundant set.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers major penetration testing areas (recon, scanning, web vulns, etc.), but notable gaps exist such as exploitation frameworks and post-exploitation tools. Additionally, the redundancy indicates incomplete coverage in certain areas.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources