No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct role, and the descriptions explicitly disambiguate near-neighbors (create_map for URLs vs create_crawl for content, batch_scrape_urls vs scrape_website by cardinality, answers vs search_web by intent). The paired async polling tools are also explicitly separated ("pass to get_crawl_results (not get_batch_results)").
Most names follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (create_map, create_crawl, get_crawl_results, search_web, scrape_website). `answers` breaks the pattern as a bare noun/verb with no object, and `batch_scrape_urls` uses a modifier prefix not seen elsewhere, but overall the convention is readable and predictable.
Eight tools is well within the sweet spot for a web-scraping/extraction server. Every tool earns its place: two discovery methods, two fetch modes, two async result retrievers, search, and direct Q&A, with no redundant entries.
The surface covers the full pipeline: discover (create_map, create_crawl, search_web), fetch (scrape_website, batch_scrape_urls), extract (answers), and retrieve async results with pagination. Minor gaps exist around job lifecycle management (listing or cancelling runs) and no explicit retry/status-check-by-id beyond the two result tools.