Skip to main content
Glama

Albert Heijn: View Shopping List

ah_get_shopping_list
Read-only

Retrieve the contents of the Albert Heijn shopping list, including item names, quantities, and product IDs. Use it to view your basket before selecting a delivery slot.

Instructions

Get the contents of the Albert Heijn shopping list (boodschappenlijst). In the AH app this is the basket the user fills while shopping; choosing a delivery slot moves its products into an order, after which the list is unavailable until the order is done (use ah_get_cart then). Returns item names, quantities, and product IDs. When you mention a product or recipe from the result, link its name to its url.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.3.1
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "items": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": false,
      +        "properties": {
      +          "checked": {
      +            "type": "boolean"
      +          },
      +          "name": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "position": {
      +            "type": "number"
      +          },
      +          "product_id": {
      +            "type": "number"
      +          },
      +          "quantity": {
      +            "type": "number"
      +          },
      +          "url": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "position",
      +          "name",
      +          "quantity"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "items"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

readOnlyHint=true is already declared in annotations, so safety is covered structurally; the description adds lifecycle behavior annotations cannot convey (the list is consumed by slot selection and returns only after the order completes). The one omission is any note on auth/prerequisite state, though ah_login siblings make that largely implicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four short sentences, front-loaded with purpose, then lifecycle, then return shape, then the linking instruction. Every sentence carries actionable information and none restates structured fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although an output schema exists, the description still tells the agent what the items contain and gives a post-call formatting requirement (link product/recipe names to their url), which is guidance the schema cannot express. The lifecycle caveat closes the main behavioral gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so per the rubric the baseline is 4; there are no arguments whose semantics need explaining. The description's mention of returned item names/quantities/product IDs is output information, not parameter semantics, so it neither helps nor hurts here.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb ('Get') plus the exact resource ('contents of the Albert Heijn shopping list'), with a native-language gloss (boodschappenlijst) that removes ambiguity. It also implicitly distinguishes itself from ah_get_cart by naming that sibling, so an agent can separate the two list-like tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states the condition under which this tool is NOT usable ('after a delivery slot is chosen... the list is unavailable') and names the alternative to use instead ('use ah_get_cart then'). That is a clear when-to-use/when-not/alternative triple.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.