Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to KSeF MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Polish Electronic Invoicing (KSeF / FA(2)). Provides tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for KSeF interoperability.
      10
      181 PyPI
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Spanish Electronic Invoicing. Provides tools to generate, validate, and submit invoices across VERI\*FACTU, Facturae/FACe, SII, TicketBAI, and Crea y Crece B2B.
      20
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for DACH e-invoicing. Create XRechnung (UBL) and ZUGFeRD 2.3 (Factur-X CII) invoices, validate against EN 16931 rules, extract data from XML, and convert between UBL, CII and JSON formats.
      6
      30 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Invapi E-Invoicing API, enabling conversion, validation, and extraction of invoices in UBL, CII, ZUGFeRD, Excel, and more.
      26 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables running a local MCP server for Poland's KSeF (Krajowy System e-Faktur) e-invoicing system, so invoice data stays on the user's own machine rather than passing through an intermediary service. It currently exposes only a diagnostic server_info tool, with invoice search and retrieval tools still to come.
      6
      1
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions, with clear workflow phases (drafting, validation, submission, retrieval). Minor overlap exists among source-document/provenance tools and between exchange-rate lookup/advice, but descriptions generally clarify boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a ksef_ prefix and mostly follow verb_noun conventions (validate_nip, list_invoices, submit_invoice). A few names deviate, like ksef_session_status (missing verb) and ksef_test_connection_check (awkward phrasing), but the pattern remains predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    23 tools fall in the heavy range for a single server, though the KSeF domain spans source documents, drafting, validation, and submission. The count is justifiable but leans high, with several advisory/provenance utilities that could potentially be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers a full invoice lifecycle: source ingestion, drafting, validation, XML preparation, submission, and retrieval/UPO download. Minor gaps exist (no source-document update/delete, no explicit draft retrieval/cancel), but agents can complete core workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues