KSeF MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to KSeF MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for Polish Electronic Invoicing (KSeF / FA(2)). Provides tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for KSeF interoperability.10181 PyPI3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceFree Polish VAT invoice generation MCP server with PDF output and preview. No API key required.23 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for Spanish Electronic Invoicing. Provides tools to generate, validate, and submit invoices across VERI\*FACTU, Facturae/FACe, SII, TicketBAI, and Crea y Crece B2B.202Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for DACH e-invoicing. Create XRechnung (UBL) and ZUGFeRD 2.3 (Factur-X CII) invoices, validate against EN 16931 rules, extract data from XML, and convert between UBL, CII and JSON formats.630 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the Invapi E-Invoicing API, enabling conversion, validation, and extraction of invoices in UBL, CII, ZUGFeRD, Excel, and more.26 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables running a local MCP server for Poland's KSeF (Krajowy System e-Faktur) e-invoicing system, so invoice data stays on the user's own machine rather than passing through an intermediary service. It currently exposes only a diagnostic server_info tool, with invoice search and retrieval tools still to come.61AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 23 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, with clear workflow phases (drafting, validation, submission, retrieval). Minor overlap exists among source-document/provenance tools and between exchange-rate lookup/advice, but descriptions generally clarify boundaries.
All tools share a ksef_ prefix and mostly follow verb_noun conventions (validate_nip, list_invoices, submit_invoice). A few names deviate, like ksef_session_status (missing verb) and ksef_test_connection_check (awkward phrasing), but the pattern remains predictable.
23 tools fall in the heavy range for a single server, though the KSeF domain spans source documents, drafting, validation, and submission. The count is justifiable but leans high, with several advisory/provenance utilities that could potentially be consolidated.
The server covers a full invoice lifecycle: source ingestion, drafting, validation, XML preparation, submission, and retrieval/UPO download. Minor gaps exist (no source-document update/delete, no explicit draft retrieval/cancel), but agents can complete core workflows without dead ends.