list-containers
Check the running status of all Business Central Docker containers in a single list.
Instructions
List all Business Central Docker containers with their running status
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Check the running status of all Business Central Docker containers in a single list.
List all Business Central Docker containers with their running status
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It states it lists containers with running status but provides no further details on behavior (e.g., if it runs a command, requires authentication, or has performance implications). Adequate but minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, clear sentence that conveys the tool's purpose without extraneous information. Perfectly concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters or output schema, the description is adequate for a simple list tool. However, adding context about output format or whether it lists across all environments could improve completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so baseline score is 4. The description does not need to add parameter information.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('List all...containers') and the scope ('all...with their running status'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'container-info' which likely provides details on a specific container.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'container-info' or 'list-apps'. The description lacks context on use cases or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/olederkach/bcdocker'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server