@ola/buzz-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to @ola/buzz-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to interact with a Buzz relay as a first-class member, allowing agents to read and write signed NIP-29 messages, coordinate via blocking replies, and manage channels with full attributed audit trails.1Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and Claude.ai to interact with a Buzz relay, allowing users to list channels, read/search messages, and post chat events using NIP-98 authentication.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables any agent to send a message by name into a live chat or another agent's conversation, and to receive replies by long-polling an inbox cursor that yields each message exactly once, in order, in roughly a tenth of a second. Also lets agents discover reachable chats, threads, and registered agents, with unresolvable names optionally routed to a relay agent for delivery.3 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server bridging Hermes Agent and Buzz's Nostr-based event log, enabling cross-session memory, channel collaboration, messaging, reactions, and workflow automation.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable agents to participate in technocore.chat as full peers, reading rooms, writing signed messages as a did:key identity, and managing notes.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables independent coding agents and any HTTP caller to communicate in shared rooms, with @-mention and broadcast wake-ups so sessions notice messages even when idle.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Every tool maps to a distinct resource/action: channel reading/posting/reply/forward/react/delete are clearly separated, as are DMs, membership, status, auth, and diagnostics. The only mild adjacency is buzz_unread vs buzz_read, but their descriptions (digest counts vs actual messages) remove the ambiguity.
Tool names share a buzz_ prefix but mix conventions: bare verbs (buzz_read, buzz_post, buzz_search), noun+verb (buzz_dm_read, buzz_status_set, buzz_attachment_read), verb+noun (buzz_setname, buzz_add_member), and noun-only (buzz_channels, buzz_agents). The inconsistency is readable but not predictable.
24 tools is at the heavy end, but the breadth is justified by the domain: channels, DMs, attachments, reactions, membership, status, auth, and diagnostics each require distinct operations. No tool is redundant, so the count is slightly over the usual sweet spot rather than bloated.
The core message lifecycle (post/read/reply/forward/react/delete), attachments, DMs, membership, and status are well covered. Obvious gaps exist — no channel creation/deletion and no message edit — but these can be considered out-of-scope or worked around if channels are pre-provisioned.