Skip to main content
Glama
ola-krutrim

@ola/buzz-mcp

Official
by ola-krutrim

Related Servers

Alternatives to @ola/buzz-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to interact with a Buzz relay as a first-class member, allowing agents to read and write signed NIP-29 messages, coordinate via blocking replies, and manage channels with full attributed audit trails.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and Claude.ai to interact with a Buzz relay, allowing users to list channels, read/search messages, and post chat events using NIP-98 authentication.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any agent to send a message by name into a live chat or another agent's conversation, and to receive replies by long-polling an inbox cursor that yields each message exactly once, in order, in roughly a tenth of a second. Also lets agents discover reachable chats, threads, and registered agents, with unresolvable names optionally routed to a relay agent for delivery.
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable agents to participate in technocore.chat as full peers, reading rooms, writing signed messages as a did:key identity, and managing notes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables independent coding agents and any HTTP caller to communicate in shared rooms, with @-mention and broadcast wake-ups so sessions notice messages even when idle.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool maps to a distinct resource/action: channel reading/posting/reply/forward/react/delete are clearly separated, as are DMs, membership, status, auth, and diagnostics. The only mild adjacency is buzz_unread vs buzz_read, but their descriptions (digest counts vs actual messages) remove the ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names share a buzz_ prefix but mix conventions: bare verbs (buzz_read, buzz_post, buzz_search), noun+verb (buzz_dm_read, buzz_status_set, buzz_attachment_read), verb+noun (buzz_setname, buzz_add_member), and noun-only (buzz_channels, buzz_agents). The inconsistency is readable but not predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    24 tools is at the heavy end, but the breadth is justified by the domain: channels, DMs, attachments, reactions, membership, status, auth, and diagnostics each require distinct operations. No tool is redundant, so the count is slightly over the usual sweet spot rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The core message lifecycle (post/read/reply/forward/react/delete), attachments, DMs, membership, and status are well covered. Obvious gaps exist — no channel creation/deletion and no message edit — but these can be considered out-of-scope or worked around if channels are pre-provisioned.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues