Skip to main content
Glama
oktawianwybieralski

SynAgent MCP - Cross-Agent CLI Bridge

by oktawianwybieralski
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to SynAgent MCP - Cross-Agent CLI Bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • codex-mcp

      larrynutzagger-glitch
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Remote MCP coding bridge that gives ChatGPT/Codex secure local workspace access, including file retrieval, semantic code intelligence, Git, diagnostics, and guarded shell execution.
      45 npm
      MIT

    • LSP-MCP

      blackwell-systems
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Bridges the Model Context Protocol with Language Server Protocol to provide AI agents with persistent access to code intelligence features including navigation, diagnostics, refactoring, and completion across 7+ programming languages.
      2,399 npm
      MIT

    • antigravity-mcp

      khoa-na
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI clients like Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex to invoke Google Antigravity's Gemini coding agent for repository-aware file operations, command execution, code review, test generation, and quota checks, while also providing a standalone dual-mode CLI.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools target distinct Codex usage modes: status, analysis, debugging, review, implementation, and consultation. However, codex_analyze, codex_consult, and codex_review_code have adjacent boundaries that could cause occasional misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use a consistent codex_ prefix and snake_case, which makes the set predictable. There is minor inconsistency between verb-only names (codex_analyze, codex_implement, codex_consult), verb_noun names (codex_debug_error, codex_review_code), and a noun name (codex_status).

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a Codex CLI wrapper, and each tool represents a meaningful, non-redundant operation. The count is neither thin nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers common Codex interactions including status, analysis, debugging, review, implementation, and consultation. Minor gaps exist around applying changes, continuing sessions, or explicitly generating/running tests, but agents can work around these limitations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources