wafeq_warehouses_retrieve

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the READ-ONLY label adds no new behavioral information beyond the structured data. The GET endpoint and 'single warehouse' scope add minor context, but no auth, rate-limit, or error behavior is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded, but redundant: 'Retrieve warehouse' and 'Endpoint for retrieving a single warehouse' restate the same purpose, and the READ-ONLY marker duplicates the annotation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter read-only endpoint with rich annotations, the description covers the essential purpose and resource scope. It lacks an explicit return-value description, but the tool name and 'retrieve warehouse' make the expected output sufficiently clear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage and one required id parameter, the description's URL pattern /warehouses/{id}/ helps map id to a warehouse identifier. However, it does not explicitly define the parameter type, format, or source of the id, leaving some inference to the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Retrieve warehouse' and 'Endpoint for retrieving a single warehouse', with a specific verb, resource, and singular scope. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like wafeq_warehouses_list and wafeq_warehouses_create.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The usage context is implied by 'retrieving a single warehouse' and the required id parameter, but there is no explicit guidance on when to choose this over wafeq_warehouses_list or other warehouse endpoints. No alternatives or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.