Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to HORIZON SHIELD KIRA

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    | 地価トレンド予測 | 新宿区の5年後地価をAI予測。CAGR・投資シグナル付き | | 企業立地需要分析 | 名古屋市中区のオフィス・工場需要スコアを算出 | | ファミリー向け適性評価 | 横浜市西区の教育・安全・医療スコアを総合評価 | | ポートフォリオ最適化 | 東京・大阪・埼玉の3エリアに投資配分を最適化 | | What-If シナリオ分析 | 大阪市中央区で新駅開設シナリオを試算 | | 店舗出店適地評価 | 福岡市博多区の人流・商業施設・交通データで出店適性を判定 |
    38
    53 npm
    1
    AGPL 3.0

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Check if a contractor's remodeling bid is fair — analyze a quote (fairness score + red flags), get 2026 cost estimates by city, and look up BLS trade labor rates.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables agents to turn customer conversations into provably correct remodeling quotes by extracting catalog-bounded line items with evidence and calculating prices deterministically.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    LLM pricing for coding agents: every price carries its source and the date it was last confirmed, and disputed prices are flagged. Looks up model rates, costs a described workload, and finds cheaper models that score at or above a given one. Local, no API key.
    3
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides construction-supervision tools for small-to-medium building projects, including stage guidance, inspection checklists, progress tracking, next-stage recommendations, and quotation analysis. It enables local, standards-based MCP interaction over stdio without third-party MCP SDKs.
    5
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents and finance teams to extract structured fields from messy invoices and audit them before payment, applying seven evidence-backed risk rules that catch total/tax mismatches, duplicate invoices, missing fields, future dates, and round amounts, then returning a 0–100 score with a payment link. Exposes four MCP tools over stdio and Streamable HTTP (spec 2025-11-25) plus a web UI, backed by an optional AWS Bedrock or OpenAI-compatible extraction brain that degrades gracefully to a zero-dependency offline engine.
    MIT

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 15 tools

Disambiguation4/5

The cluster of price tools (get_price_range, audit_estimate, preview_reverse_estimate, verify_fair_price, create_ap2_fairness_attestation) overlaps in intent, but descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other (e.g. 'for the typical range use get_price_range, for a signed attestation use verify_fair_price') which sharply reduces misselection. The remaining tools (category list vs. search, source metadata, red-flag check, contractor finder, guide, agent card) are clearly distinct.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool uses consistent snake_case verb_noun form (list_cost_categories, get_price_range, audit_estimate, verify_integrity_claim, find_verified_contractor). Verb style is uniform and predictable throughout.

Tool Count4/5

15 tools sits at the top of the well-scoped range and reflects a genuinely multi-layered domain (price data, auditing, tamper-evident verification, AP2 bridge, contractor discovery, editorial guide). A few niche tools (get_agent_card, suggest_ehn) are marginal but each maps to a real workflow step.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the full audit lifecycle: category discovery, price lookup, quote auditing, preview, red-flag detection, cryptographic verification, attestation, and contractor referral. Minor gaps only — no cost-history/trend tool beyond price trend fields and no comparison across multiple quotes.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessSyncing