Create webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It reveals the POST method and the verbatim error relay on 400, but does not disclose idempotency, side effects, or behavioral constraints beyond creation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no waste. The first sentence gives the core purpose, the second adds a specific usage tip. Information is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description omits the return value (e.g., created webhook ID). It also lacks details about authentication, prerequisites, or the body's composition. For a create operation, this is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'body' has a description that merely references the external API schema without specifying required fields or structure. The schema allows arbitrary properties, so the description adds minimal value over the schema itself.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create a new webhook') and the resource ('in Loyverse'), and includes the HTTP method and endpoint. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like loyverse_delete_webhook or loyverse_list_webhook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives error handling guidance for 400 responses, but does not explain when to use this tool over other create tools or provide context about webhook use cases. It lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.