Skip to main content
Glama
og-mcp

Microsoft Fabric MCP Server

by og-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to Microsoft Fabric MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Microsoft Fabric by exposing tools for managing workspaces, notebooks, SQL queries, pipelines, and Livy Spark sessions. It provides a comprehensive set of operations for data engineering and analytics tasks using standard Azure authentication.
      37
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Python MCP server that lets you manage Microsoft Fabric through natural language in Claude Code or Claude Desktop, with 77+ tools covering workspaces, lakehouses, warehouses, SQL, DAX, semantic models, notebooks, pipelines, OneLake, and Microsoft Graph.
      83
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes Azure AI Foundry agents, workflows, and AI Search vector-database capabilities as MCP tools, enabling natural language interaction with agents, semantic search, and index management.
      10
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Remote and centralized MCP server that enables AI models to interact with Microsoft Fabric (workspaces and items) via the Fabric Core REST API, using delegated OAuth 2.1 authentication with Microsoft Entra ID so each user's permissions and restrictions are respected.
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI-powered, governed access to Microsoft Fabric data assets with 16 tools for querying, schema discovery, knowledge retrieval, and export.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 105 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The generic item/job tools (fabric_get_item, fabric_delete_item, fabric_run_job, fabric_get_item_definition) overlap directly with type-specific tools (fabric_get_lakehouse, fabric_delete_lakehouse, fabric_run_notebook, fabric_get_notebook_definition), so an agent can easily select the wrong one for the same resource and action. Descriptions help in some cases, but the boundaries between generic and type-specific tools are repeatedly unclear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools consistently use the fabric_ prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (list/get/create/update/delete/run). Minor inconsistencies exist, such as domain-prefixed names like fabric_onelake_* and fabric_git_*, add vs create for role assignments, and generic vs type-specific definition/run tools.

    Tool Count1/5

    105 tools is an extreme count for an MCP tool surface, far beyond even the 25+ threshold. Many tools duplicate generic item operations (list_items vs list_lakehouses, delete_item vs delete_lakehouse, etc.), which inflates the count without adding proportional coherence.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers most major Fabric domains—workspaces, lakehouses, warehouses, notebooks, pipelines, semantic models, shortcuts, Git, deployment pipelines, and jobs—and the generic item tools fill many lifecycle gaps. Some areas remain asymmetric (connections/gateways/capacities are mostly read/list-only, reports/semantic models lack direct create/update), but agents can often work around these via generic tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive