Microsoft Fabric MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Microsoft Fabric MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Microsoft Fabric by exposing tools for managing workspaces, notebooks, SQL queries, pipelines, and Livy Spark sessions. It provides a comprehensive set of operations for data engineering and analytics tasks using standard Azure authentication.374MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Power BI and Fabric through MCP tools, including workspace discovery and semantic model queries, with an agent loop and HTTP endpoints for Next.js backends.21 npmMIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA Python MCP server that lets you manage Microsoft Fabric through natural language in Claude Code or Claude Desktop, with 77+ tools covering workspaces, lakehouses, warehouses, SQL, DAX, semantic models, notebooks, pipelines, OneLake, and Microsoft Graph.83-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceExposes Azure AI Foundry agents, workflows, and AI Search vector-database capabilities as MCP tools, enabling natural language interaction with agents, semantic search, and index management.102MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRemote and centralized MCP server that enables AI models to interact with Microsoft Fabric (workspaces and items) via the Fabric Core REST API, using delegated OAuth 2.1 authentication with Microsoft Entra ID so each user's permissions and restrictions are respected.GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI-powered, governed access to Microsoft Fabric data assets with 16 tools for querying, schema discovery, knowledge retrieval, and export.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 105 tools
The generic item/job tools (fabric_get_item, fabric_delete_item, fabric_run_job, fabric_get_item_definition) overlap directly with type-specific tools (fabric_get_lakehouse, fabric_delete_lakehouse, fabric_run_notebook, fabric_get_notebook_definition), so an agent can easily select the wrong one for the same resource and action. Descriptions help in some cases, but the boundaries between generic and type-specific tools are repeatedly unclear.
Tools consistently use the fabric_ prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (list/get/create/update/delete/run). Minor inconsistencies exist, such as domain-prefixed names like fabric_onelake_* and fabric_git_*, add vs create for role assignments, and generic vs type-specific definition/run tools.
105 tools is an extreme count for an MCP tool surface, far beyond even the 25+ threshold. Many tools duplicate generic item operations (list_items vs list_lakehouses, delete_item vs delete_lakehouse, etc.), which inflates the count without adding proportional coherence.
The server covers most major Fabric domains—workspaces, lakehouses, warehouses, notebooks, pipelines, semantic models, shortcuts, Git, deployment pipelines, and jobs—and the generic item tools fill many lifecycle gaps. Some areas remain asymmetric (connections/gateways/capacities are mostly read/list-only, reports/semantic models lack direct create/update), but agents can often work around these via generic tools.