Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Life Memory MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to save and recall durable facts from a local JSON memory store, and to selectively share memories with other users through consent-based, expiring bundles.
      344 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a persistent, vendor-neutral memory layer that allows AI tools and agents to share context and knowledge across different platforms while maintaining local data ownership. It enables users to store, recall, and manage structured memories through hybrid semantic search and automated context assembly.
      9 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides persistent personal and organizational knowledge storage that any LLM can connect to for instant context about who you are, what you do, and your preferences. Enables AI agents to maintain long-term memory across sessions through structured data categories, semantic search, and export/import capabilities.
      27
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables each user to have a private, per-user memory store that persists across AI tools, allowing them to store, recall, search, list, and delete memories via MCP.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to persist and retrieve memories via a personal knowledge graph, with tools for emotional intelligence, CRM, life management, social features, self-training, and autonomous insights.
      40 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables personal cross-tool memory by exposing a searchable episodic archive of AI sessions and a curated, high-trust semantic facts layer through MCP tools and resources.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: profile creation vs. memory saving vs. sharing vs. export/import. The descriptions explicitly clarify boundaries, such as start_memory_save_interview not saving a memory and save_memory being the final step.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_memory_profiles, create_memory_profile, search_memory). One outlier is life_memory_install_info, which is a noun phrase rather than verb_noun, and start_memory_save_interview is slightly awkward but still readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the set is well-scoped for a memory management server covering profiles, sharing, public registry, and consent workflows. Each tool appears to earn its place without excessive redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    Core operations like create, read (search/list), delete, and sharing are present, but obvious gaps exist: no update_memory to edit an existing memory, no delete_memory_profile to remove a profile, and no list_memories to enumerate all entries in a profile without search.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues