instagram_search_users

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the tool's purpose but does not reveal any behavioral traits such as search algorithm, pagination, rate limits, or whether it returns exact matches or fuzzy results.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence with no filler. It front-loads the action and resource, making it immediately understandable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple, but given that an output schema exists (content not shown), the description could be considered adequate. However, it lacks guidance on search behavior (e.g., case sensitivity, partial matches, or limitations). It is minimally complete for a straightforward search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning parameters have no descriptions. The description adds the phrase 'by name or username', which clarifies the 'query' parameter's intent. However, the 'count' parameter is left unexplained, and no additional details about expected input format are given.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (search), the resource (Instagram users), and the method (by name or username). It is specific and distinct from sibling tools like 'instagram_search_hashtag' or 'instagram_get_followers'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies its use for finding users, but it does not explicitly mention when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'instagram_get_followers' or 'instagram_get_similar_accounts'. No exclusions or context are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.