Skip to main content
Glama
Offensive360 MCP Server

Offensive360 MCP Server

Official
by offensive360

Related Servers

Alternatives to Offensive360 MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to run pre-publish security and code-quality scans across 17 categories, generate a 0–100 security score and Markdown report, quickly check critical vulnerabilities, and receive fix/refactor suggestions by finding ID.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to scan a repository or project for malware, supply-chain attacks, leaked secrets, and web, server, cloud, and CI/CD vulnerabilities, then confirm real findings with concrete attack scenarios and fixes. Exposes scan, guide, and reference tools plus a security-review prompt that runs locally.
      607 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI editors to run local security scans for vulnerabilities, leaked secrets, risky dependencies, IaC, container, license, and posture issues through MCP. It lets assistants surface findings and fix them in the same turn.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding assistants with real-time security scanning superpowers, including SAST, secrets detection, dependency CVE scanning, and web vulnerability assessment.
      24 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one initiates a scan and another checks its queue status. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same 'o360_scan_' prefix followed by a noun, creating a consistent and predictable naming pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the set feels thin. The scope is narrowly focused on scanning and status, but the count is at the borderline of being too minimal.

    Completeness2/5

    The set covers initiating a scan and checking status, but lacks operations like retrieving results for finished scans, cancelling scans, or listing past scans. This creates a significant gap for users who need to manage scans over time.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues