cursor-usage
Related Servers
Alternatives to cursor-usage
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides comprehensive telemetry and usage analytics for Claude Code sessions, including token usage tracking, cost monitoring, and tool usage patterns. Enables users to monitor their Claude usage with detailed metrics, warnings, and trend analysis.12-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceReal-time Claude.ai subscription awareness for AI coding assistants. Surfaces live utilization, forecasts limits, gates expensive operations, and measures real per-task cost.51 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceTracks token usage and records coding sessions for Claude Desktop users, supporting both local SQLite and cloud Cloudflare D1 databases.280 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides intelligent analysis of token usage patterns and optimization recommendations to improve efficiency and reduce costs in Claude Code sessions. Offers real-time analysis, cost metrics, and actionable insights for better context window and tool usage optimization.3 npm-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceCompares AI coding tool spend before and after a migration -- Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode, Codex CLI -- via an MCP server, real numbers from each vendor's own API or local logs.17 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceReal-time analytics dashboard for Claude Code, tracking sessions, tool usage, file changes, and token costs via an MCP server.1 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific metrics or actions, such as get_agent_edits for edit metrics, get_daily_usage for user-level data, and set_spend_limit for administrative control. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool without confusion.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix for retrieval operations and 'set_' for configuration, using snake_case throughout. This predictability enhances readability and usability for agents.
With 17 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for the comprehensive analytics and management scope of Cursor usage. It covers various aspects like billing, usage, and team management without feeling overly bloated.
The tool set provides complete coverage for analytics and administrative tasks in the Cursor domain, including metrics retrieval (e.g., usage, spending, models), team management, and spend control. There are no obvious gaps, enabling agents to handle all relevant workflows effectively.