azure-compliance-mcp
The azure-compliance-mcp server provides read-only Azure resource compliance data to LLM agents, with honest distinctions between pass, fail, and not_evaluable verdicts — never faking a status when data is unavailable. Every finding includes a source field (arg, azure_policy, or defender) and a remediation hint.
Check compliance (check_compliance): Evaluate security and governance controls across Azure resources:
required_tags— verify resources have required tags (env, owner, costCenter)tls_min_1_2— detect storage accounts or services allowing TLS below 1.2public_network_access— identify resources with public network access enableddisk_encryption— check encryption-at-host on VMs (partial; ADE not assessed)guest_config_extension— assess guest configuration policy complianceFilter by control, resource type, scope, and status (
pass/fail/not_evaluable/all)
Query resources (query_resources): Look up Azure resources using structured, read-only filters:
Filter by resource type, Azure region, name substring, and/or tag key-value pairs (AND logic)
Returns ARG-shaped projections (id, name, type, location, resource group, tags, subscription)
Configurable result limit
Get VM patch status (get_patch_status): Report per-VM patch posture from Azure Update Manager assessments:
Identify VMs with pending updates, filterable by severity (
critical,security,all) and status (pending,current,not_evaluable,all)Honestly reports
not_evaluablefor deallocated VMs or those lacking assessment data
Find orphaned RBAC assignments (find_orphaned_rbac): Detect role assignments whose principal no longer exists in Microsoft Entra ID — only marks an assignment as orphaned on positive directory not-found evidence, never on a guess.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@azure-compliance-mcp Which VMs are non-compliant with policy?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
azure-compliance-mcp
Honest Azure compliance for LLM agents — ask infra-health questions in plain English and get answers that distinguish a real
failfrom anot_evaluable, and never fake apass.
An MCP server, built with FastMCP 3.x, that exposes read-only Azure resource-compliance data so an agent can answer questions like "which storage accounts allow TLS 1.0?" or "which VMs have no disk encryption?" — each finding tagged with where the verdict came from and whether it could be evaluated at all.

Why honest compliance?
Most tooling collapses "compliant", "non-compliant", and "couldn't tell" into a single pass/fail bit — so a control it can't actually measure silently shows green. This server refuses to guess:
fail— positive evidence a protection is absent (e.g.encryptionAtHost = false). Actionable; shows up in the default view.not_evaluable— the signal genuinely isn't in the data (e.g. no guest-config policy assigned). Surfaced explicitly, never as a pass.source— every finding records the signal that decided its verdict:arg|azure_policy|graph|defender.
Related MCP server: Purple AI MCP Server
Quickstart
Requires uv and Python 3.12+. Runs out of the box — mock mode needs zero Azure setup.
uv sync # install dependencies
uv run python scripts/demo.py # fastest look — runs the tools against mock data
uv run server.py # mock data, stdio transport — works immediatelyPoint it at your own tenant when you're ready:
uv run server.py --mode live # real Azure Resource Graph (e.g. after `az login`)
uv run server.py --transport http # remote: Streamable HTTP
uv run fastmcp dev inspector server.py # explore the tools interactivelyLive mode authenticates with DefaultAzureCredential against your own tenant and is strictly read-only.
Architecture
Tools depend only on a Provider protocol, never on a concrete data source — so the same tool code runs against synthetic mock data or live Azure Resource Graph (ARG), selected at startup with --mode.
flowchart LR
Agent["LLM agent / MCP client"] -->|stdio · HTTP| Server["FastMCP server\n(5 read-only tools)"]
Server --> Protocol["Provider protocol\n(read-only)"]
Protocol -->|--mode mock| Mock["MockProvider\nseeded ARG-shaped data"]
Protocol -->|--mode live| Live["LiveProvider\nDefaultAzureCredential"]
Live -->|injection-safe KQL| ARG[("Azure Resource Graph\nresources · policyresources ·\npatchassessmentresources · authorizationresources")]
Live -->|getByIds| Graph[("Microsoft Graph\nprincipal existence")]Controls (check_compliance evaluates five):
control | source | signal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tools (5 of a 5–6 budget):
tool | source | honest behavior |
|
| the five controls above; unmeasurable signal ⇒ |
|
| read-only projection with filters pushed into KQL |
|
| Update Manager assessments from |
|
| assignments from ARG |
Transports: stdio (default, local) and Streamable HTTP (remote, intended behind OAuth 2.1). In stdio mode stdout is reserved for the protocol — logging goes to stderr only.
See SPEC.md for the full tool contracts.
Design decisions & tradeoffs
Mock provider is the default. The repo runs with zero Azure account, credentials, or network — so reviewers, CI, and new contributors get meaningful output immediately. The mock dataset is shaped exactly like ARG rows, so one mapping serves both modes.
Read-only by construction. No tool can create, update, or delete a resource. The live path only ever issues ARG queries; there is no mutation surface to misuse.
Control-based, not Azure-Policy-based. Compliance is evaluated from resource configuration (the ARG row), so it works even when no Azure Policy is assigned — except where the signal genuinely lives elsewhere (guest-config), which routes to
policyresourcesand is honest about it.The
not_evaluable+sourcehonesty model. A third status plus a provenance field means the agent can tell "this is broken" from "I can't see this from here" — the core reason to trust the output.KQL pushdown for scale. Live filters (
query_resources) are pushed into the ARG query (where+take) rather than fetched-then-filtered, so large tenants stay cheap. An opt-in contract test asserts the pushdown matches the reference Python filter, so both modes stay provably consistent.Injection-safe escaping. ARG has no bind parameters, so every user-supplied value is encoded as an escaped KQL string literal — never concatenated raw. (ARG is read-only regardless, but the discipline is enforced and unit-tested.)
Status & roadmap
v0.3.0 — check_compliance, query_resources, get_patch_status, and find_orphaned_rbac shipped (mock + live), honest not_evaluable/source model across all of them, KQL pushdown, CI on every PR.
Next:
summarize_health— rolled-up infra-health summaryevals — task-level evaluation of agent answers over the mock dataset
Development
uv run pytest # tests (live tests are opt-in: RUN_LIVE_TESTS=1)
uv run ruff check . # lint
uv run ruff format --check . # formatEvals (opt-in)
Tests prove the tools behave; the eval suite (SPEC §5) checks the
property the server exists for: given a natural-language question, does an
agent call the right tool, with the right arguments, and answer correctly —
including saying "that can't be determined" when the honest answer is
not_evaluable.
# needs ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (env or the gitignored .env); calls the API — costs money
uv run --group evals python evals/run.py # full suite (~20 cases)
uv run --group evals python evals/run.py --cases rbac # filter by case id
uv run --group evals python evals/run.py --agent-model <id> # evaluate another agent model
# alternate provider for cost-free smoke runs (needs OPENROUTER_API_KEY);
# a non-Anthropic judge is OFF-PIN vs SPEC §5.4 — the report flags it
uv run --group evals python evals/run.py --provider openrouter \
--agent-model <openrouter-id> --judge-model <openrouter-id>Runs against mock mode only (deterministic, no Azure credentials). Results
land in evals/results/<timestamp>-<model>.json plus a rendered summary;
they're gitignored except deliberately committed baseline-* files. Structured
assertions are exact-match; open-ended prose is scored by a pinned LLM
judge whose ~85–92% human-agreement caveat is printed in every report — judge
scores are signal, not ground truth. Deliberately not in CI (SPEC §5.6).
Security
All Azure tools are read-only — nothing in this server modifies Azure resources.
Secrets, tenant IDs, and
.envare gitignored and must never be committed; live mode uses only your localDefaultAzureCredential.In stdio mode, logging goes to stderr only (stdout is reserved for the protocol).
License
Available Tools
3 toolscheck_complianceA
Evaluate named security/governance controls and report where each verdict came from.
Honest about provenance: every finding carries a source
(arg | azure_policy | defender), and controls whose signal is not in
the available data report not_evaluable rather than guessing. Most controls
read the Azure Resource Graph resources row directly (no policy assignment
required); guest_config_extension reads guest-config compliance from the
ARG policyresources table and is not_evaluable when no policy is assigned.
disk_encryption is partial — it confirms encryption-at-host from ARG but
cannot see disk-level/ADE encryption, so a missing host-encryption signal is
not_evaluable, not fail.
Inputs: scope, control, resource_type, status_filter. Returns: result
get_patch_statusA
Report per-VM patch/update posture from Azure Resource Graph patch assessments.
Honest about provenance: every finding carries source="arg" — verdicts
come from the ARG patchassessmentresources table (Azure Update Manager
assessment data), never inferred from resource properties alone. A VM whose
posture cannot be trusted is not_evaluable — a deallocated/stopped VM
(Azure cannot assess a stopped VM) or a VM with no assessment data — with
pendingUpdateCount null (unknown, not zero), never a fake "current".
Inputs: scope, severity, status_filter. Returns: result
query_resourcesA
Look up resources with structured, read-only filters.
All filters are combined with AND. Returns an ARG-shaped projection.
Inputs: limit, location, tag_filters, name_contains, +1 more. Returns: result
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a distinct purpose: check_compliance evaluates specific security controls, get_patch_status reports VM patch posture, and query_resources performs generic read-only queries. No overlap in functionality.
All tool names use lowercase with underscores and follow a clear verb_noun pattern (check_compliance, get_patch_status, query_resources), providing a predictable and consistent naming scheme.
With only 3 tools, the server is tightly focused on Azure compliance and resource queries. While the count is somewhat minimal, each tool is well-justified and covers the core use cases without being overloaded.
The tool set covers compliance evaluation, patch status, and generic resource queries, which together address a broad range of compliance workflows. The generic query tool compensates for potential gaps, though some specialized compliance checks might be missing.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Query your org's data in natural language — read-only MCP access to SQL, NoSQL, files & warehouses.
Official Microsoft MCP Server to query Microsoft Entra data using natural language
Read-only MCP access to a documented IT fleet: state, changes, posture. 15 tools.
Query OneLens cloud-cost data in natural language: breakdowns, trends, cost centers. Read-only.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language exploration of Azure environments by generating and executing KQL queries against Azure Resource Graph. Supports multi-tenant configurations, subscription scoping, and provides direct access to Azure resource information through conversational interactions.83Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only access to SentinelOne's platform through MCP, allowing security investigations, threat hunting, and asset inventory queries via natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural-language access to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure resources, allowing users to query compute instances, OKE clusters, networking, and Object Storage via MCP tools.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates Azure Cost Management APIs via MCP, enabling cost queries, forecasts, budgets, and Advisor recommendations through natural language in compatible clients.9-