Skip to main content
Glama
odysa

RDF4J MCP Server

by odysa

Related Servers

Alternatives to RDF4J MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing SPARQL query functionalities for LLMs, enabling query execution, validation, and graph exploration across SPARQL endpoints.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      The Model Context Protocol (MCP) server provides a conversational interface for the exploration and analysis of RDF Turtle Knowledge Graph in Local File mode or SPARQL Endpoint.
      54
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI assistants to explore schema.org types, generate JSON-LD examples, validate structured data, and navigate the complete ontology with fuzzy matching and caching.
      11 npm
      21
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants access to biological and biomedical RDF databases via SPARQL at the RDF Portal, as well as selected REST APIs (NCBI E-utilities, UniProt, ChEMBL, PDB, Reactome, Rhea, MeSH, and more).
      29
      14
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., sparql_select vs. sparql_ask vs. sparql_construct). However, describe_resource overlaps significantly with sparql_construct as both return triples, which could cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_repositories, get_statistics, select_repository). The sparql_* tools use a predictable sparql_<query_type> convention, maintaining overall consistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well-scoped for an RDF4J server, covering querying, schema exploration, and repository management without feeling bloated or sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides strong coverage for querying, schema discovery, and repository selection. Minor gaps include no SPARQL UPDATE/insert/delete operations and no explicit repository creation, but these are not critical for a read-oriented RDF explorer.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues