Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
@genready/mcp-server

@genready/mcp-server

by odb366
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to @genready/mcp-server

  • ASO Score MCP

    ASO Score MCPofficial

    forgemeshlabs
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Scans websites to evaluate agent-readiness and produce an ASO Score Report across 34 signals, helping improve discoverability, trust, and interoperability for AI agents.
    5
    437 npm
    2
    MIT

Related Servers

  • OnPage.dev MCP server

    seoonpage
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to scan pages and whole sites for SEO and AI-search visibility, generate ready-to-paste fixes and validated structured data, and verify HTML before deploy and live results after — all through stable issue codes so an agent can fix problems one by one and prove they are gone.
    4
    MIT

  • OpenAEO

    charlacsina
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI coding agents to score any live domain for visibility in AI answer engines and then generate and apply paste-ready fixes — robots.txt, llms.txt, JSON-LD, titles and meta — either directly to project files or as click-by-click admin steps for hosted platforms like Squarespace, Wix and Shopify. It also re-checks edits, reads server access logs to confirm which crawlers actually arrived and whether they were genuine, and offers hosted tools for citation testing, score history, drift and competitor comparison.
    110 npm
    MIT

  • scanner

    warOnSaaS
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to analyze public websites, follow progress, retrieve shareable reports, compare multiple URLs, list checks and recent activity, and surface fixes ranked by impact.
    Apache 2.0

  • geo-optimizer

    skywalkerqqq
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables auditing websites for AI/LLM readiness and generating fixes such as robots.txt rules, llms.txt, JSON-LD schema, and meta tags, plus checking brand and domain citations through natural language.
    1
    MIT
  • agentbuilt

    agentbuiltofficial

    agentbuilt
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to run a free AI-readiness audit of any URL, checking AI crawler rules, JavaScript-free page text, JSON-LD, llms.txt, sitemap, meta description, FAQ schema, and returning a score with findings and fixes. Also exposes the same capability via an A2A agent endpoint.
    MIT
  • CitedBy

    CitedByofficial

    resaleiq
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables checking whether a page or domain can be found and cited by AI assistants and search engines, covering page-level fixes, AI-crawler access via robots.txt, llms.txt validity, and backlink strength. It is free, read-only, and requires no account.
    MIT
Deploy Server
Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 12 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct roles: scanning (analyze_website, start_site_analysis), reading (get_report, get_findings, get_fix_plan), and lifecycle (update_finding, verify_findings, get_artifact). The get_report/get_findings/get_fix_plan trio overlaps somewhat, but descriptions explicitly steer ('use get_report instead if you only need scores'), and the page-vs-site distinction is stated.

Naming Consistency5/5

All twelve tools use consistent snake_case verb_noun form (get_usage, list_reports, check_status, start_site_analysis, verify_findings). No mixing of camelCase or vague single-verb names.

Tool Count5/5

Twelve tools falls squarely in the well-scoped 3-15 range, and each maps to a distinct step in the scan-fix-verify workflow. No redundant or filler tools.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the full workflow: credit check, single/site scanning, status polling, report and findings reads, artifact generation, finding state updates, and post-deploy verification. Minor gaps exist around domain management (only list_domains, no add/remove) and report cleanup, but core CRUD/lifecycle is covered.

Maintenance

ActivityNo data
ResponsivenessSyncing

Resources