Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to infra-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A team-wide, remote MCP server that lets Claude operate Railway projects through natural language, with safety guardrails to prevent irreversible actions without human approval.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A safe, structured MCP server that lets AI inspect and operate a VPS through typed, allowlisted tools for nginx, PM2, SSL, UFW, fail2ban, with read-only defaults and opt-in mutations.
      6
      12 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Self-hostable MCP server that gives Claude tools to run shell scripts and read files on a home server, deployed via Multipass VM and Cloudflare Tunnel.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server providing a governed interface for AI agents to interact with local Docker infrastructure, featuring a two-phase confirm protocol for state-changing operations and append-only audit logging.
      4
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct infrastructure operation: container status, logs, disk usage, URL probing, deployment history, service restart, Caddy reload, and disk pruning. There is no functional overlap, and the descriptions clearly differentiate their purposes.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow an `infra_*_tool` pattern, but `service_url_tool` and `caddy_reload_tool` break the prefix convention. Additionally, the middle portion mixes nouns (logs, disk, deploys) and verbs (restart, prune, reload), making the naming pattern less predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the set is well-scoped for an infrastructure management server. Each tool covers a meaningful aspect (monitoring, logs, disk, service control, deploys, Caddy config, cleanup) without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides solid coverage for common infrastructure tasks: status, logs, disk, restart, pruning, URL checks, deploy visibility, and Caddy reload. Minor gaps like explicit start/stop or triggering deploys are noticeable but not critical since restart and deploy history cover most needs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive