chrome-devtools-mcp-mux
Related Servers
Alternatives to chrome-devtools-mcp-mux
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceShares one Chrome browser across multiple AI coding sessions via an MCP proxy, adding lifecycle management, tool filtering, and anti-detection while wrapping the upstream chrome-devtools-mcp server.2 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMulti-agent Playwright MCP server with tab isolation via targetId, enabling multiple agents to share a single Chrome browser while maintaining isolated tab groups and shared sessions.1413 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP Server for Chrome DevTools, following the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Integrates with Claude Desktop and Claude Code.308MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA multi-agent orchestrator that enables multiple AI agents to share a single Chrome browser instance with tab isolation and shared state. It preserves local browser data like cookies and logins while allowing concurrent agent sessions through the official Playwright MCP.10-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA wrapper around chrome-devtools-mcp that adds dynamic multi-browser routing, allowing connection to and switching between multiple Chrome instances at runtime.2 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables multiple Claude Code sessions to share a single HTTP MCP endpoint, lazily spawning stdio MCP servers only when their tools are called, reducing idle processes and memory usage.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 29 tools
Tools have distinct purposes: interaction (click, drag, fill), page management (new_page, close_page), and diagnostics (performance, console, network). Some overlap exists between fill, type_text, and press_key, but descriptions clarify their specific use cases. Snapshot vs screenshot are clearly differentiated.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., list_console_messages, take_screenshot, performance_start_trace). No mixed conventions or vague verbs like 'process' or 'do_thing' are present.
29 tools is on the higher end but appropriate given the broad scope of Chrome DevTools functionality covered (interaction, performance, network, memory). Each tool serves a distinct need, and the count is justified even if slightly above the typical 15-tool comfort zone.
The surface covers core DevTools workflows: page navigation, element interaction, script evaluation, console/network inspection, performance tracing, and screenshots. Minor gaps exist (e.g., cookie management, network interception) but can be worked around via evaluate_script.