get_dashboard
Retrieve a Redash dashboard by ID or slug, including all widget configurations.
Instructions
ダッシュボード1件(id または slug)。ウィジェット構成を含む。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| identifier | Yes |
Retrieve a Redash dashboard by ID or slug, including all widget configurations.
ダッシュボード1件(id または slug)。ウィジェット構成を含む。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| identifier | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It mentions returns widget configuration, but lacks information on permissions, error cases, or response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, concise but minimal. No structure like bullet points or separate sections. Adequate for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given one required param, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is marginally complete. It explains what the tool returns but lacks details on response format and potential errors.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% coverage for identifier parameter. Description adds that identifier can be id or slug, which is essential meaning beyond the schema. Could still add format examples.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it retrieves a single dashboard by identifier, optionally including widget configuration. It implicitly distinguishes from list_dashboards (list) and get_query (different resource).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like execute_query or list_dashboards. Sibling tools exist but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/oceandepthz/redash-api-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server