Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ocean-agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for OpenAlgo, enabling algorithmic trading operations via natural language commands.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables any compatible AI model to autonomously trade Binance USDT-margined perpetual futures. Includes a separate paper-trading strategy lab that requires no credentials.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for Aster DEX perpetual futures trading, enabling AI agents to access real-time market data, perform institutional-grade analysis, execute orders, and run automated trading strategies.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Agent-native, self-hosted MCP server for crypto trading and DeFi management. Enables agents to query balances, execute trades, and manage positions with a policy engine and secure key storage.
      7
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for the Hyperliquid decentralized exchange, enabling AI assistants to perform trading operations, manage accounts, and retrieve market data.
      307 PyPI
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but some overlap exists between open_funding_position, open_pacifica_leg, and open_with_bracket (all open positions) and between scan_funding and plan_oi_hedge (both analyze funding rates). Descriptions are detailed enough to disambiguate with careful reading.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming mixes verb-first (open_*, close_*, evaluate_*) with noun-style (account_status, print_status, top_setups) and participial (learned_winrates, learned_combos). The print_* group is consistent, but overall there is no single predictable pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    22 tools is on the heavy side (16-25 range). The scope covers many features (funding farming, OI hedging, Prints, TA, risk, learning), so the count is defensible, but it pushes the upper bound of what feels scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers account management, funding farming lifecycle, OI hedging, Prints, technical analysis, risk recommendations, and a feedback loop for predictions. Missing a general close-position tool for regular perps and order management, but these are minor given the focused domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues