Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ocean-agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for OpenAlgo, enabling algorithmic trading operations via natural language commands.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables any compatible AI model to autonomously trade Binance USDT-margined perpetual futures. Includes a separate paper-trading strategy lab that requires no credentials.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI agents read Hyperliquid perpetual futures market data and their own account state, then place and cancel orders, adjust leverage, move USDC from spot to perp, and convert stablecoins to USDC. It holds no credentials and never contacts the exchange, routing every request through a runtime that enforces caps and signs server-side.
      9
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for Aster DEX perpetual futures trading, enabling AI agents to access real-time market data, perform institutional-grade analysis, execute orders, and run automated trading strategies.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Agent-native, self-hosted MCP server for crypto trading and DeFi management. Enables agents to query balances, execute trades, and manage positions with a policy engine and secure key storage.
      7
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but some overlap exists between open_funding_position, open_pacifica_leg, and open_with_bracket (all open positions) and between scan_funding and plan_oi_hedge (both analyze funding rates). Descriptions are detailed enough to disambiguate with careful reading.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming mixes verb-first (open_*, close_*, evaluate_*) with noun-style (account_status, print_status, top_setups) and participial (learned_winrates, learned_combos). The print_* group is consistent, but overall there is no single predictable pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    22 tools is on the heavy side (16-25 range). The scope covers many features (funding farming, OI hedging, Prints, TA, risk, learning), so the count is defensible, but it pushes the upper bound of what feels scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers account management, funding farming lifecycle, OI hedging, Prints, technical analysis, risk recommendations, and a feedback loop for predictions. Missing a general close-position tool for regular perps and order management, but these are minor given the focused domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues