get_seasons

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden but only describes returned data (season numbers, episode counts, rating keys). It does not disclose error conditions, performance characteristics, or authentication needs, but the read-only nature is implied.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences front-loaded with the purpose. Each sentence adds value (action, prerequisite, output). No superfluous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, output schema exists), the description covers input source and output. It could mention error handling or validity, but is sufficient for basic usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, but the description explains that the rating_key should come from 'search or browse', adding meaningful context. The output is also briefly described, helping the agent understand the parameter's role.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get the seasons of a TV show' and specifies the required input and returned data (season numbers, episode counts, rating keys). The verb 'Get' and resource 'seasons' are specific, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_episodes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs to 'Provide the rating_key of a show (from search or browse)', giving clear context on input source. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use this tool or alternatives, though the sibling list provides indirect contrast.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.