delete_tag

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states deletion but doesn't mention side effects (e.g., impact on associated recipes), reversibility, authorization requirements, or error handling (e.g., behavior if tag doesn't exist).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with one sentence. It front-loads the key information but could include more context without losing conciseness (e.g., notes on idempotency or return value).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete tool with one parameter, the description is somewhat complete. However, it fails to address common behavioral context like idempotency, behavior for non-existent IDs, or whether the operation is reversible. With no output schema, return value is also not described.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds value by specifying that tag_id is a UUID, which is not indicated in the schema beyond 'string'. However, it doesn't provide format details or constraints (e.g., allowed characters, length). Given 0% schema coverage, this is a minimal but useful addition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (a tag), using a specific identifier (UUID). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like delete_category or delete_recipe, which target different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update_tag or deactivate). No prerequisites or conditions mentioned. The description lacks context for appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.