get_upcoming_releases

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does indicate a read-only listing operation and the paginated nature via the page parameter. However, it does not disclose ordering, freshness, potential rate limits, authentication needs, or whether results are limited by any criteria beyond 'announced upcoming.'

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one clear opening sentence and one param explanation. Every sentence earns its place, and the main purpose is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple paginated listing tool with an output schema present and a single optional parameter, the description provides enough to invoke the tool correctly. The main gap is the lack of guidance on when to choose this over the overlapping get_anticipated_albums tool, but this is partially a usage-guidelines concern.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema property page has no description, so the description's 'One-based page number for more upcoming releases' adds useful meaning. It clarifies the parameter's format and purpose, which is sufficient given there is only one optional parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'List announced upcoming album releases.' It clearly identifies what the tool returns and distinguishes it from similarly named siblings like get_new_releases and get_new_singles. However, it does not explicitly differentiate itself from the closely related get_anticipated_albums.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'announced upcoming album releases' implies when the tool should be used, but no explicit alternatives, exclusions, or conditions are given. An agent is left to infer how this differs from get_anticipated_albums or get_new_releases rather than being told.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.