Set Alert Thresholds

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate a write operation (readOnlyHint=false), so the description's 'Configure' is consistent. However, it does not disclose behavioral traits like whether setting thresholds overwrites existing ones, applies per-server, or has side effects. Some extra context is added by naming the metrics, but there is room for more.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence that is front-loaded with the verb and object, and it names the key metrics. No filler or redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no output schema and simple annotations, the description covers the core purpose but omits important context about side effects (e.g., existing thresholds being replaced) and the requirement for a valid server name. It is adequate for a basic config tool but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 75% (3 of 4 params have descriptions). The description names the threshold types, which aligns with the schema and helps clarify consecutive_failures_before_alert (which lacks a schema description). It does not add much beyond what the schema already specifies for the other parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Configure') and resource ('alert thresholds') and lists the key metrics involved. It clearly distinguishes this tool from sibling tools like check_server, get_uptime, and register_* which serve different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (when you need to set alert thresholds) but provides no explicit when-to-use vs alternatives or exclusions. It doesn't mention when not to use this tool, such as when only viewing thresholds is needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.