fflStopSession
Stop a running ffl session by providing its session ID.
Instructions
Stop a running ffl session by sessionId.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sessionId | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Stop a running ffl session by providing its session ID.
Stop a running ffl session by sessionId.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sessionId | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It only says 'Stop', omitting whether the operation is safe, idempotent, or has side effects, leaving significant gaps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. However, it could be more informative without sacrificing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter tool, the description barely covers the basics. It does not mention the output schema, preconditions, or error cases, which limits completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description merely mentions 'by sessionId' without adding meaning beyond the parameter name. With 0% schema coverage, the description fails to clarify the parameter's format or constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action ('Stop'), resource ('ffl session'), and the required identifier ('sessionId'). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like fflGetSession and fflListSessions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The implied usage is to stop a running session, but there is no explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives, or conditions for use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nuwainfo/ffl-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server