list_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. 'List all' implies a read-only, complete enumeration of numbering/bullet lists, which conveys a safe non-destructive profile and no filtering. It does not disclose return format, permissions, or whether the front-document default changes behavior, leaving moderate gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler; every word contributes to scope and intent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read tool with one optional param this is nearly sufficient, but with no output schema the description should indicate what a 'defined list' is and what is returned. The scope word 'all' is the only hint, leaving a modest completeness gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single document_id parameter, including its default and accepted forms, so the schema does the heavy lifting. The description adds no parameter semantics beyond what the schema already states, making the baseline 3 correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb (List) and resource (defined lists) scoped to a document, which separates it from siblings like list_define or list_applyToParagraph. It does not explicitly name those siblings, but the resource is distinct enough that an agent can identify the intent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus list_define, list_applyToParagraph, or list_restartNumbering. No preconditions or context are given; the agent must infer usage entirely from the name and resource.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.