mcp-feedback-enhanced-gw
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP_DEBUG | No | Debug mode (true/false) | false |
| MCP_LANGUAGE | No | Force UI language (zh-TW/zh-CN/en) | Auto-detect |
| MCP_WEB_HOST | No | Web UI host binding | 127.0.0.1 |
| MCP_WEB_PORT | No | Web UI port | 8765 |
| MCP_DESKTOP_MODE | No | Desktop application mode (true/false) | false |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| logging | {} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| extensions | {
"io.modelcontextprotocol/ui": {}
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| interactive_feedbackA | Interactive feedback collection tool for LLM agents. USAGE RULES:
|
| get_system_infoA | Get system environment information Returns: str: System information in JSON format |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely unrelated purposes: one handles interactive feedback collection, the other retrieves system information. There is no overlap or confusion between them.
Both names use snake_case, but 'interactive_feedback' uses an adjective+noun pattern while 'get_system_info' follows verb+noun. This minor inconsistency prevents a perfect score.
With only two tools, the server feels underdeveloped. The name suggests a feedback-focused gateway, yet only one tool is feedback-related and the other is unrelated system info.
The feedback tool is described extensively but there is no explicit end tool, retrieval of prior feedback, or integration with the system info tool. The overall domain coverage is sparse and ad hoc.