Pipedrive MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Pipedrive MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs like Claude to interact with Pipedrive CRM data through a standardized interface, providing 22 tools for managing deals, persons, organizations, activities, and more.221MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with Pipedrive CRM via Claude Code, allowing users to manage deals, contacts, activities, and more through conversational commands.2611 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides full CRUD access to Pipedrive CRM API, enabling Claude and other LLM applications to manage deals, persons, organizations, activities, notes, and leads with advanced filtering and fuzzy search capabilities.1,053 npm6MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to manage Pipedrive CRM data including deals, contacts, and activities directly through an AI assistant. It supports full CRUD operations, email engagement analysis, and mapping of custom field metadata for comprehensive pipeline management.123118 npm8MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables read-only access to Pipedrive data including deals, persons, organizations, and pipelines, allowing LLMs like Claude to query and analyze CRM information through natural language.161,053 npm60MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables to manage Pipedrive deals, activities, persons, organizations, and custom fields with automatic backup and restore capabilities, allowing safe pipeline management via natural language.28-
TDQS
Scored across 303 tools
Most tools are clearly scoped by resource (deals, persons, organizations, products, leads) and action (list, create, update, delete). However, there are several pairs that could be confused: deals_list_field_updates vs deals_list_updates vs deals_list_participant_updates all provide different update feeds; users_get_current vs system_get_current_user both return the current user; leads_convert_to_deal and deals_convert_to_lead are distinct but could be mistaken for each other.
The tool names follow a consistent <entity>_<action> pattern (e.g., deals_list, deals_create, deals_update). A few minor deviations exist such as 'systems_get_current_user' instead of 'users_get_current' and 'lead_labels_create' vs 'leads_get_labels', but overall the pattern is clear and predictable.
With 303 tools, this server is vastly over-scoped for a typical agent. The sheer number makes it difficult for an agent to discover and select the right tool, even though each individual tool may be well-defined. A more curated set of essential CRUD and workflows would be more appropriate.
The server covers the full lifecycle for core entities (deals, persons, organizations, products, leads, activities, notes, files) including create, read, update, delete, search, add/remove followers, and basic analytics. However, there are gaps in edge-case operations like webhook management, permissions, and custom fields, though they are present, and the completeness of specific workflows like lead conversion is supported.