Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
nubiia-dev

Pipedrive MCP Server

by nubiia-dev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Pipedrive MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Pipedrive MCP Server

      osherai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs like Claude to interact with Pipedrive CRM data through a standardized interface, providing 22 tools for managing deals, persons, organizations, activities, and more.
      22
      1
      MIT

    • Pipedrive MCP

      expertintegrado
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with Pipedrive CRM via Claude Code, allowing users to manage deals, contacts, activities, and more through conversational commands.
      26
      11 npm
      MIT

    • Pipedrive MCP Server

      ckalima
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to manage Pipedrive CRM data including deals, contacts, and activities directly through an AI assistant. It supports full CRUD operations, email engagement analysis, and mapping of custom field metadata for comprehensive pipeline management.
      123
      312 npm
      10
      MIT

    • Pipedrive MCP Server

      WillDent
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to Pipedrive data including deals, persons, organizations, and pipelines, allowing LLMs like Claude to query and analyze CRM information through natural language.
      16
      100 npm
      60
      MIT

    • mcp-pipedrive

      leonardoceron-yvy
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables to manage Pipedrive deals, activities, persons, organizations, and custom fields with automatic backup and restore capabilities, allowing safe pipeline management via natural language.
      28
      -
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 303 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    With 303 tools there are numerous near-duplicates: system_get_current_user vs users_get_current vs users_get, search_deals vs deals_search vs search_universal, and three listing variants (persons_list, persons_list_all_auto, persons_get_collection). These overlapping tools make selection ambiguous for an agent even with detailed descriptions.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow an entity_action pattern (deals_get, persons_update, teams_create), but several break it with verb-first names (search_universal, search_deals, search_persons, search_by_field) and singular/plural inconsistencies (users_find vs persons_search, lead_labels_create vs leads_get_labels). Still readable but not a single predictable convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    303 tools is an extreme mismatch for practical agent use; the surface is far beyond well-scoped, with many redundant list/search/current-user variants that could be consolidated. This makes discovery and correct tool selection very difficult.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is extremely broad—CRUD, bulk operations, followers, fields, pipelines, webhooks, lead/deal conversion, etc.—with few true gaps. Minor dead ends exist (e.g., channels can be created/deleted but not updated, no user delete), but core CRM lifecycles are comprehensively covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources