Skip to main content
Glama
ntworm

Ableton MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Ableton MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP client to inspect and modify a running digital audio workstation session through a local Python remote-script TCP bridge, exposing tools for session and track structure, clip slots and MIDI notes, devices and browser items, and mixer/transport control. Read and bulk-write operations cover tempo, naming, clip creation and note editing, muting/soloing/arming, playback and scene launching, and device parameter loading and adjustment.
      32
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for inspecting and controlling Ableton Live through a local HTTP bridge. Enables LLMs to perform production workflows like MIDI import, track editing, mixing, mastering, and export.
      59
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server to control Ableton Live via the Live API, offering curated tools for transport, tracks, clips, devices, automation, and more, plus a generic layer to access the entire Live Object Model.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 97 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several read/snapshot tools overlap heavily (get_session_overview, get_session_info, get_track_state, take_snapshot, get_composition_structure) and clip/device queries plus analysis/generation tools have nearby scopes. Descriptions help, but at 97 tools an agent will frequently struggle to pick the right one.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are mostly snake_case, but the set mixes patterns: get_, list_, live_find_, diagnose_, music_generate_, groove_, set_, create_, and a stray diff_snapshots_tool. Readable, yet not a single predictable verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    97 tools is far beyond a well-scoped MCP surface (typical 3-15). Many are niche diagnostics, capability-refusal stubs, or overlapping read helpers, making the server heavy and hard to navigate.

    Completeness3/5

    Coverage is broad across session/transport, tracks, clips, devices, browser, automation, audio analysis, generation, and extension workflows. However, obvious lifecycle gaps remain: no scene create/delete/rename, no track deletion, and no direct clip-stop operation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues