Akakçe set price alert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It usefully discloses that the tool creates or updates an alert, that a notification fires when the target price is reached, and that login is required, but it omits behavior such as what happens to an existing alert, error handling when unauthenticated, and whether the call returns a confirmation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two tight sentences with the core action and trigger front-loaded. Every clause adds useful information with no wasted wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description covers the main purpose, required inputs, trigger behavior, and login requirement. It still leaves gaps around return behavior and how existing alerts are handled, so it is adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both 'code' and 'targetPrice' are already documented. The description restates their meaning and adds the trigger semantics, but does not provide syntax or format details beyond the schema, making the baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb/resource: 'fiyat alarmı kurar/günceller' for a product, with the trigger condition 'fiyat hedef değere düşünce bildirim gelir'. It is clear what the tool does, though it does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools like akakce_price_alerts or akakce_notifications.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states the required inputs and that login is required, which implies when the tool is usable. However, it does not explicitly say when to choose this over akakce_price_alerts or how it relates to notification listing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.