A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceExposes Volcengine ARK Seedance 2.0 video generation capabilities via MCP tools, enabling text-to-video, image-to-video, and multimodal reference generation locally.
3
9
MIT
Seedream/Seedance MCP Server
by nsmao-com
Related Servers
Alternatives to Seedream/Seedance MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI image generation using Doubao Seedream models and video generation using Doubao Seedance models through Volcano Engine's API, supporting text-to-image, image-to-image, text-to-video, and task status queries.334 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables image generation and editing using Volcengine Ark Doubao-Seedream models, with tools for text-to-image, image-to-image, editing, and result polling.421 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI image generation through Volcano Engine's Seedream 4.0 API, supporting text-to-image, image-to-image, multi-image fusion, and sequential generation with automatic local saving and Markdown support.522MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI image generation using Volcano Engine's Seedream 4.0 API with text-to-image, image-to-image, multi-image fusion capabilities, built-in prompt templates, and automatic cloud storage integration.19MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAI-powered image and video generation and processing server that supports text-to-image, image-to-image, text/image-to-video generation, image analysis, and comprehensive editing operations (crop, resize, convert, adjust) through providers like Doubao and Aliyun.6MIT
TDQS
C2.2/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation2/5
Multiple tools have unclear boundaries and overlapping purposes. For example, 'generate-image', 'generate-img-seedream4', and 'text-to-image' all appear to generate images, with only minor distinctions in implementation or input method that are not clearly differentiated in the descriptions. This ambiguity will likely cause misselection by agents.
Naming Consistency3/5
The naming conventions are mixed but still readable. Most tools use a verb_noun pattern (e.g., 'generate-image', 'generate-video'), but there are deviations like 'image-dressing' and 'action-imitation' that use noun_verb or other structures. While not chaotic, the inconsistency reduces predictability.
Tool Count4/5
With 8 tools, the count is reasonable and well-scoped for a media generation server focused on images and videos. It covers key operations without being overly heavy, though some tools might be redundant, which is addressed in other dimensions.
Completeness2/5
There are significant gaps in the tool surface for the domain of digital media generation. The server lacks essential operations such as editing or deleting generated content, managing tasks (e.g., checking video generation status), or handling errors. Additionally, three tools are marked as unsupported in the current mode, further limiting functionality.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues