translate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Mentions the algorithm but does not explain side effects, rate limits, or authentication requirements. The description adds some context about returning a single GIF but lacks thorough behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise, well-structured with introduction and Args section. No extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With output schema existing, the description sufficiently explains the tool's purpose and parameters. No major gaps given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description compensates well: explains 'term' with examples and 'rating' with allowed values and default. Adds meaning beyond schema's type and default.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool translates a word/phrase to a single most relevant GIF using Giphy's WeirdnesS algorithm. Distinguishes from sibling tools like search_gifs (which returns multiple) by emphasizing single-result behavior.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Indicates it's 'great for reactions and responses' and provides example terms. Does not explicitly state when not to use or compare to alternatives, but the context implies it's for single-result needs versus search.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.