Skip to main content
Glama
noxlabs-ai
by noxlabs-ai

Related Servers

Alternatives to inpost-consumer-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A demonstration MCP server built in TypeScript that shows how to implement stdio-based communication for integration with MCP clients. Serves as a template for building custom MCP servers with strong typing and maintainability.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A horizontally scalable Model Context Protocol server for exposing shipment tracking (and other data sources) as authenticated MCP tools, starting with DB Schenker's public tracking endpoint.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Yango Delivery B2B API, enabling price estimation, express-courier claim creation and confirmation, courier tracking, and recipient tracking links through natural language.
      13
      95 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A modular MCP server that connects to external APIs, providing tools for weather data, user management, and company operations. Features a scalable architecture with TypeScript support, HTTP client abstraction, and robust error handling.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      General TypeScript MCP server that provides tools for OpenClaw capabilities, including balance and invoice retrieval from RMappi/Osuria.
      3
      8 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server for Lidl Plus (NL + DE) that reads receipts and manages coupons via the lidl-plus library, using refresh tokens for authentication.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: login flow tools are separate from parcel listing/detail, locker operations are distinct from tracking and returns. No two tools overlap in a way that would cause misselection; even list_parcels and get_parcel are clearly list vs. single-item operations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'inpost_consumer_' prefix, and most follow a verb_noun pattern (list_parcels, get_parcel, track, list_returns). However, some names are structured as noun_verb (locker_open, locker_finish) or use a domain prefix (login_send_sms, login_sessions, login_confirm), creating minor inconsistency in the verb/noun order.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for a consumer-focused InPost service. Each tool covers a necessary part of the user journey—auth, parcel viewing, locker operation, tracking, and returns—without unnecessary bloat or sparseness.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core lifecycle: login, logout, session management, listing and getting parcels, opening and finishing locker sessions, tracking, and listing returns. Minor gaps exist, such as no per-return detail view or explicit support for creating a return, but these are edge cases and the essential workflows are fully supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues